The research used an innovative financial socialization indicator to measure the degree of family influence in transmitting financial skills. There are three dimensions based on actions taken by parents: financial behavior models, explicit teaching, and experiential teaching.
To provide perspective, questions about financial socialization were also posed to older generations, asking them to recall how their families interacted with them during their youth.
The analysis showed that Generation Z and Millennials scored considerably higher than Baby Boomers, primarily due to greater reliance on explicit parental teaching. The correlation between financial socialization and financial literacy is positive, albeit moderate, while experiential teaching shows a deeper impact. Practical experiences, such as managing a personal budget or receiving money on a regular basis, proved crucial for developing financial skills.
A noteworthy finding is that, despite only 40% of Generation Z youth reporting frequent discussions about economic matters with their parents, this represents a marked improvement compared to previous generations. Baby Boomers, for instance, discussed such topics far less often in the family, limiting conversations mainly to daily expenses.
The methods parents use to give money to their children have also evolved over time. While a significant percentage of people in older generations did not receive a regular allowance when they were young, only 15% of Generation Z youth report receiving no money at all. However, the most common approach is still providing money “as needed.”
The study confirms that parents’ education levels appreciably affect their children’s financial literacy. As a result, this skill is particularly low among NEETs (Not in Employment, Education, or Training—a condition affecting 15% of the sample, especially children of less-educated parents). This cohort has a score of 46, dropping to 43 among female NEETs due to the gender differences described in a previous article in this series.